Bridging the gap: University to professional qualifications

Thompson, P and Surgeoner, D (2014) Bridging the gap: University to professional qualifications. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 167(4), pp. 189-200. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

The jump from higher education to professional qualifications can be challenging. Engineering students do not necessarily leave university with the reflective and planning skills required for initial professional development (IPD). Many trainees do not understand IPD. These professional skills are not well covered in most UK universities. If this gap can be bridged then graduates may be more employable. This paper presents a case study where an IPD-style portfolio is used to assess the challenging breadth of the subject of sustainability with a large and diverse cohort of students. The details of the assessment, teaching methods and marking criteria are described and the challenges presented are discussed. Feedback was gathered from current students from the past 3 years, representatives of industry and the professional institutions. Ten companies were consulted including detailed interviews with recent graduates and senior engineers responsible for staff development and links to professional institutions. They were enthusiastic about the ideas presented in this work. This approach could be adopted widely throughout the university engineering curriculum. Professional institutions could consider how they might benefit from closer links with higher education. As professional institutions implement online systems for IPD they could consider ways to involve undergraduate students in the process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: education; training
Index terms: interview, case study, qualification, engineer, higher education, teaching method, professional development, undergraduate
Subjects: educational institutions, teaching methods, educational resources, curriculum development, profession, professional development, data collection methods
Topics: Information Management, Education, Roles and Professions, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here