Australian construction supervisors' response to occupational health and safety

Cooke, T; Lingard, H and Blismas, N (2013) Australian construction supervisors' response to occupational health and safety. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 166(6), pp. 287-296. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

A survey of Australian construction workers was conducted within three different organisations. The purpose of the survey was to determine whether members of workgroups within the construction industry develop unique and group-specific safety climates. The existence of group safety climate was ascertained by the degree of consensus between members of the same workgroup about their supervisors' response to safety within the organisation and the extent to which these perceptions varied between different workgroups within the same organisation. The research also evaluated the extent to which group-level safety climates were statistically linked to the injury/incident performance of workgroups in the three organisations. Although limited by the reliance on macro-incident data as the measure of workgroup safety performance, workers' perceptions of supervisors' safety expectations were inversely correlated with injury/incident rate in one organisation. The results provide much needed empirical evidence revealing the important role played by supervisors in defining the workgroup safety climates. Given that supervisors are a critical conduit through which organisational safety goals are articulated and achieved, the results indicate that the safety responses of first-level supervisors are likely to be just as important as, if not more so, than the actions of top management in construction organisations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: health & safety; safety & hazards
Index terms: construction worker, supervisor, construction industry, construction organization, evidence, top management, safety performance, injury, safety climate, survey, occupational health and safety
Subjects: health safety and environment, evaluation and assessment methods, organization, practitioner, management, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, data collection methods
Topics: Health and Safety, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here