NEC contracts for design-build-operate contracts

Patterson, R L and Trebes, B (2013) NEC contracts for design-build-operate contracts. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 166(5), pp. 260-268. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

The NEC Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC) is a popular choice for construction and design-and-build contracts in the UK and South Africa. They are also increasingly by being used elsewhere in the world, for example in New Zealand and in Hong Kong. The NEC family of contracts is specifically designed for international use. The NEC Term Service Contract (TSC) is also increasingly being used for contracts to provide a service including, often, the operation and maintenance of an asset. Some clients are increasingly looking to appoint a contractor to design, build and operate an asset and so take a real interest in the operability and operating cost of the asset. This paper looks at key issues specific to design, build and operate contracts and explains how the NEC ECC and NEC TSC could be combined to form the basis of a design, build and operate contract. It is true that changes would be required, but with an NEC base to the contract, all parties would have the benefit of starting from what have become industry standard forms of contract, namely forms that are designed for clarity, flexibility and, most importantly, as a stimulus to good management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contracting; contracts & law; procurement
Index terms: construction contract, operating cost, standard form of contract, New Zealand, Hong Kong, South Africa, operation and maintenance
Subjects: contract type, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, Geography, maintenance engineering
Topics: Business Strategy, Procurement, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here