Wamuziri, S (2013) Factors that influence safety culture in construction. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 166(5), pp. 219-231. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
Although there is no consensus on how to define the safety culture of an organisation, the concept is now recognised as an essential contributor to improved occupational safety performance in construction. Indeed, the subject of safety culture has attracted considerable attention in the literature in recent years. The health and safety culture in an organisation is determined by the social and psychological relationships in the workplace. Some view safety culture as a management issue but so fuzzy to the extent that it cannot be measured or reliably changed. This paper aims to explore and to make explicit some of the key factors that influence safety culture in construction. The concepts of organisational culture and climate are firstly discussed. The concept of health and safety culture is then evaluated including the factors that influence it; its assessment and measurement methods. The results of interviews with site safety managers of construction companies that exhibit strong safety cultures are reported. The objective of this work was to determine what works for them. The results reveal that the factors that contribute to positive and negative safety cultures in construction can be grouped into six categories: organisation factors, individual factors, team factors, job design factors, management factors and supervisory factors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracting; management; safety & hazards |
| Index terms: | safety culture, job design, occupational safety, manager, management issue, interview, health and safety, construction company, measurement method, organizational culture |
| Subjects: | practitioner, organization, health safety and environment, data collection methods, financial and cost management, management, occupational health and safety management, sociology |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here