Ndekugri, I (2013) The consulting engineer and corporate manslaughter risk. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 166(3), pp. 128-136. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
Consulting engineers now run the risk of a criminal conviction under the UK Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007. Surviving the financial impact and inevitable reputational damage from a corporate manslaughter conviction would be a huge challenge to most consulting engineers. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of literature that imparts knowledge and understanding of this risk. As a contribution to the necessary remedial action, this paper applies legal analysis and research methods to the Act, case law and construction industry practice. It assesses the likely impact of the Act on the consulting engineer with respect to five preconditions of a corporate manslaughter conviction: (a) the organisation charged with it is one to which the legislation applies; (b) the organisation owed the victim a 'relevant duty of care'; (c) the way in which the activities were managed or organised amounts to a 'gross breach' of that duty of care; (d) the way in which the organisation's activities were managed or organised caused the death of the victim; and (e) 'the way in which the organisation's activities were managed or organised by its senior management was a substantial element' in the gross breach of duty.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracts & law; liability |
| Index terms: | liability, construction industry practice, case law, legislation, duty, legal analysis, consulting engineer |
| Subjects: | contractual role, management, liability law, legal systems, profession |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here