Emuze, F A and Smallwood, J J (2013) Reducing 'non-value-adding activities' when building infrastructure in South Africa. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 166(3), pp. 121-127. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
The purpose of the investigation was to examine issues pertaining to poor project performance by identifying non-value-adding activities and their causes in South African construction. The assessment was undertaken through a quantitative survey conducted among public sector clients, consulting engineers, and general contractors involved in civil engineering projects in South Africa. Selected findings were that the respondents perceive that non-value-adding activities such as inadequate supervision and waiting for critical tasks to be completed contributed significantly to poor project performance in South Africa. In addition, the respondents were of the opinion that factors contributing to non-value-adding activities in South Africa include lack of appropriately skilled workers, repetitive revisions and changes, and delay in design approval. Although the findings are based on the perceptions of stakeholders in the South African infrastructure sector only, the discourse supports the argument that it is imperative to limit/eliminate non-value-adding activities in the construction process in order to engender improvement in project performance in the sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing countries; municipal & public service engineering; project management |
| Index terms: | consulting engineer, general contractor, public-sector client, survey, approval, developing country, infrastructure sector, South Africa, construction process, non-value-adding activity, skilled worker, project management, supervision, investigation, project performance |
| Subjects: | sociology, industry analysis, management, project management theory and practice, profession, data collection methods, control systems, building construction, Geography, development economics, contractual role, practitioner |
| Topics: | Project Management, Geographical Context, Site Management, Contract Administration, Human Resources, International Construction, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here