Managing design for the delivery of best value

Johnson, K A L (2013) Managing design for the delivery of best value. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 166(3), pp. 111-120. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

The overall project process and basic project requirements are outlined and a range of reasons are suggested as to why projects underperform. Some of the difficulties of establishing priorities are discussed in the context of achieving best value rather than simply low cost. The results from some recent research into current design practice in the built environment and how designers are educated and trained are summarised. This brief paper limits discussion to those areas that are considered to have the potential to deliver the greatest returns particularly in combination. They are the role of clients and their advisors, the education and continuing training of professional designers, improving understanding of the design process by all stakeholders, and the application of information and communications technology to establish a project platform for the communication of strategy, objectives and information. These lead to the focus on design as a fundamental driver in delivering best value and hence the importance of managing design. Various concepts and processes are proposed, together with a range of methods and techniques that can be applied depending on the type, scale and nature of the project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: education & training; project management
Index terms: project management, best value, built environment, strategy, communications technology, designer, design practice, platform, low cost, design process
Subjects: project management theory and practice, management, digital design, profession, innovation and technology management, design process, infrastructure and transport systems, bidding, design methods
Topics: Project Management, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here