Spottiswoode, B H and MacKellar, D C R (2013) The role and effect of technical review panels. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 166(2), pp. 103-108. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
The technical review of civil engineering projects by independent experts has been performed in South Africa on an ad hoc basis for many years. The scope of an independent review was generally limited to particular elements of the project in which the implementing authority (or the designer) considered that a review would be advisable. Later, with funding agencies such as the Development Bank of Southern Africa becoming involved in the financing of infrastructure development, such as roads or water supply projects, individuals were routinely appointed to act as independent reviewers of the main technical aspects, during both the design and construction phases. It would be natural that, as the size, complexity, and cost of projects have increased, the practice would have become more widespread, but in recent years it is only for large bulk water storage and delivery projects that independent technical review panels have been mobilised. This paper discusses the history and current practice of independent technical review in South Africa, the structure of the panels, extent of their involvement in projects, their relationship with project teams, and finally their perceived effect and benefit to the project. In the view of client bodies, the benefits that have accrued from the use of technical review panels have justified their cost.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | project management; quality control; reviews |
| Index terms: | project management, project team, quality control, design and construction, funding, designer, becoming, Africa, complexity, financing, South Africa, history, agency, infrastructure development, water supply |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, contractual arrangements, infrastructure engineering, Geography, philosophical process, profession, regions and continents, project delivery, architectural and construction history, project management theory and practice, sociology, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here