Technical networks: The framework for disseminating knowledge

Hendy, C R; Spencer, P C and Sundaram, M (2013) Technical networks: The framework for disseminating knowledge. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 166(2), pp. 77-85. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

Within the civil engineering industry there are numerous methods of communicating knowledge. These include formal methods, such as through peer-reviewed papers, conferences and websites, and informal methods such as new teams coming together and sharing their experiences. However, knowledge management is more than just communicating lessons; it involves the creation, capture, sharing and leveraging of knowledge and, without all these aspects present is unlikely to be effective. Capturing all useful knowledge in a project life cycle and cascading the lessons learnt to industry, and indeed within organisations, presents a significant challenge to achieve consistently. This paper presents a tried-and-tested solution which employs a named individual on each project, the knowledge capture coordinator, in conjunction with a framework of technical, discipline-led, networks. In essence, the knowledge capture coordinator is responsible for capturing learning on the project and feeding past learning into the start of the project, while the technical networks review, develop and validate the learning captured and ensure it is subsequently available and communicated in the most appropriate manner to all who need to know. This paper discusses in detail how this is achieved and elaborates on the role of the KCC and networks in driving continuous improvement. It is based on a process employed within the Highways and Transportation business of Atkins.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: communications; control systems; project management
Index terms: knowledge capture, knowledge management, control system, life cycle, conference, continuous improvement, project management
Subjects: value management, performance measurement, monitoring and control, professional development, project management theory and practice, research dissemination and communication, knowledge management
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Project Management, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here