Polycentric governance: Water management in South Africa

Muller, M (2012) Polycentric governance: Water management in South Africa. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 165(3), pp. 193-200. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

Water resource management is poorly understood and defined since the characteristics of water resources and their use are locally specific and differ widely from place to place. Beyond that, water as a renewable natural resource does not fall into conventional analytical paradigms. It is an input to many economic activities but also an integral part of the natural environment with important social and cultural dimensions. It has proven difficult to provide an analytical definition of the resource, for legal and management purposes. Recent economic literature, notably the writings of Professor Elinor Ostrom, offer a helpful framework. Her suggestion that water resources should be seen as a 'common-pool resource', best managed under 'common-property regimes' in 'polycentric governance systems' is helpful, if apparently abstract. The reform of South African water law and management arrangements since 1994 illustrates many of the underlying issues and provides a practical example of Ostrom's approach. The challenges of implementation highlight the importance of understanding the analytical concepts in their full context as failure to do so can undermine their usefulness and effectiveness as practical management tools. South Africa's implementation experience reinforces Ostrom's warnings against seeking single optimal solutions for the complex challenge of water resource management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contracts & law; management; water supply
Index terms: water resource, paradigm, natural resource, effectiveness, water supply, South Africa, dimension, implementation, governance, water management, economic activity
Subjects: environmental resource management, business, education and knowledge transfer, infrastructure and transport systems, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, environmental engineering, health monitoring assessment and metrics, performance management, Geography
Topics: Research Practice, Sustainability, Governance, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here