A model to manage the water industry supply chain effectively

Mackenzie, N and Tuckwood, B (2012) A model to manage the water industry supply chain effectively. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 165(3), pp. 181-192. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

The water industry is capital intensive and dependent on complex supply networks in the delivery of service characteristics, making procurement a critical activity. This paper rejects 'the lowest bid' form of procurement of the past and advocates the total cost and strategic relationship management procurement of the future. The authors develop arguments for more effective procurement leading to real cost reduction and service enhancement on a sustainable basis. This requires a range of strategic activities from the approach to the acquisition of major capital goods and associated services through to the management of relationships with contractors, suppliers and supply chains. The paper considers the differing procurement practices in Europe, Australia and the USA, and how, in comparison, equivalent practices result in higher costs in the UK than elsewhere. From this they propose a model for best practice procurement in the utilities industries and a step-by-step set of actions for improving performance. The proposed model begins with a strategic appraisal of procurement activity across an organisation focusing on overall objectives and desired outcomes leading to an effective operating model including the end-to-end management of the supply chain and the policy, resources and enabling technology required for successful delivery.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contracts & law; procurement; water supply
Index terms: Europe, relationship management, appraisal, Australia, utilities, cost reduction, acquisition, water supply, best practice
Subjects: management, infrastructure and transport systems, business, physical geography and landforms, economics, factor and component analysis, construction type, Geography
Topics: Human Resources, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here