Norton, M and Lane, A (2012) 'New water architecture': An integrated water management model. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 165(3), pp. 159-171. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
An integrated framework for the management of water in England and Wales is proposed that optimises the organisation of service infrastructure, customers and stakeholders to derive optimal social, economic and environmental health. 'New Water Architecture' recognises the intrinsic links between water stakeholders, and between water and other essential resources, particularly food, energy and biodiversity. A systems-based approach strengthens integration of physical infrastructure, controlling institutions, and the overarching society consensus. Consideration is also given to future pressures with resilience to climate change strengthened by initiatives that slow water passage across the landscape. Implementation of the framework requires coordinated water policy across traditionally discrete resource sectors. This need is investigated alongside specific initiatives related to system management, abstraction licensing and pricing. Capital investment should be targeted towards 'low-regret' infrastructure argued to be high flow storage, aquifer storage and recovery, sustainable drainage systems and water transfers. These examples deliver multiple benefits and can be further optimised if existing networks, particularly inland waterways, are revitalised to enable regional integration of water sources.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | water supply; waterways & canals |
| Index terms: | England, pricing, water supply, implementation, society, physical infrastructure, drainage, climate change, waterway, environmental health, Wales, recovery, licensing, integration, water management, canal, capital investment, biodiversity |
| Subjects: | environmental health, environmental resource management, communities and social development, economic analysis, biodiversity, organizational analysis, water management, contractual arrangements, infrastructure and transport systems, operations management, knowledge transfer, climate science, Geography |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Project Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here