Integrating human rights into water governance

Grimes, H J (2012) Integrating human rights into water governance. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 165(3), pp. 141-157. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

Frequent talk of a 'water crisis' has prompted the water resources sector to move its focus away from improving the physical infrastructure in developing countries and towards the strengthening of water governance, in the belief that the 'crisis' is one of governance rather than simply the physical scarcity of water. Although this is still the case with regard to domestic water supply, water scarcity is now also a matter of concern in many developing countries in terms of food production. This paper argues that many water governance reforms have focused on the process of governance itself, without adequate definition of the end goal of the reforms or the responsibilities that governments have towards their people when facing water scarcity. The paper discusses how human rights concepts can be used to define clear end goals for water governance reforms and presents a framework using positive aspects from both water governance and human rights. After discussing the application of the framework to a case study, the paper concludes that such a framework can assist governments in planning, implementing and monitoring the measures necessary to address the critical issues that affect their communities' access to water for essential uses.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: developing countries; government; water supply
Index terms: water resource, governance, case study, critical issue, monitoring, water supply, physical infrastructure, developing country, human rights, strengthening
Subjects: structural engineering, development economics, criminal law, environmental engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, business, data collection methods, risk assessment, control systems
Topics: Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Risk Management, International Construction, Site Management, Research Practice, Governance
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here