Liguori, D; Sommerville, J and Manase, D (2012) Housing association preferred form of partnering. In: Smith, S D (ed.) Proceedings of 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
Partnering has been implemented by many Housing Associations as the procurement arrangement to maximize value. There are two dominant forms of partnering being utilized, namely strategic and project partnering. The ethos of strategic partnering is long term collaborative working for a series of projects, as opposed to project partnering, based on short term collaboration. There are conflicting views on the appropriateness of each form of partnering and the value that can be achieved. This creates ambiguities for Housing Associations when attempting to implement a partnering arrangement, who may be confronted by a dichotomy between long term value and short-term savings induced by market prices. The form of partnering currently implemented by Housing Associations must be identified. Distinguishing between each form of partnering and the rationale for selection will assist Housing Associations with their decision-making process to implement the appropriate form. The methodology adopted was a fusion between quantitative and qualitative fieldwork. This integrated the numerical data for the frequency of use and the conducted interviews to achieve an understanding of the reasons for selection. Furthermore guidance has been provided to Housing Associations on the form of partnering being implemented within their sector and the perceived benefits that can be achieved. The findings unveiled that the strategic form of partnering is the preferred arrangement for Housing Associations due to the longer term benefits being achieved through continuity of relationships.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | housing associations; partnering; procurement; project; strategic |
| Index terms: | housing association, methodology, collaboration, savings, decision-making process, partnering, interview |
| Subjects: | partnership management, decision analysis, management, research methods, economic analysis, institutional client, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here