Bridging public works project performance gaps in South Africa

Emuze, F and Smallwood, J J (2012) Bridging public works project performance gaps in South Africa. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 165(2), pp. 111-118. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

The construction industry's role in terms of infrastructure development cannot be overemphasised. However, shortage of skills, poor productivity, accidents, time overruns, rework, cost overruns and corruption have marginalised infrastructure development in the developing world, and Africa in particular. Regardless of these shortcomings, the importance of the industry in terms of nation building motivated the South African government to embark upon continuous funding of infrastructure projects that are underpinned with appropriate fiscal policies in order to increase the pace of service delivery. This paper is a synopsis of performance-related barriers and interventions relative to infrastructure projects. Based upon a survey of the literature and a quantitative survey conducted among Eastern Cape-based consulting engineering firms, civil engineering contractors and selected public sector client organisations, performance gaps were identified in South African public works projects. The research findings indicate that there is major scope for performance improvement in South African public works construction projects, especially in terms of availability of technical and managerial skills in the infrastructure sector.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: municipal & public service engineering
Index terms: South Africa, infrastructure sector, construction project, performance gap, corruption, engineering firm, rework, public-sector client, infrastructure development, survey, infrastructure project, construction industry, engineering contractor, funding, performance improvement, public work, fiscal policy, project performance, managerial skill, cost overrun, productivity, time overrun, service delivery, Africa
Subjects: performance management, performance measurement, management, project management theory and practice, professional development, service delivery, firms, sociology, project controls, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, data collection methods, regions and continents, financial and cost management, infrastructure engineering, Geography, production management, professional ethics, operations management, public policy, economic analysis
Topics: Time Control, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here