Bell, R (2012) Mentoring in the oil and gas industry. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 165(2), pp. 95-101. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
This paper is about the mentoring of graduate engineers in the oil and gas industry. The paper starts by defining what measurable success should look like for graduates, and outlines a 5-year plan leading to professional membership of Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). Key steps en route are defined as technical competency, ICE membership, understanding the business and technical excellence. The author and other senior professionals developed two uniquely appropriate training courses, one at graduate entry level and the other at advanced level. These courses were used to train many graduates and other engineers in the essential skills and techniques of oil and gas structural engineering. The courses were produced and delivered freely, in the spirit of 'learned society' and 'passing on the faith' and were tremendously well received. References include recent ICE and Institution of Structural Engineers proceedings papers around the topic of 'what should be taught in structural engineering design?'. Most of the literature comes from the academic side; this paper comes from a practitioner's perspective. The principles involved can be readily applied to all branches of civil engineering.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | education & training; offshore engineering |
| Index terms: | engineering design, mentoring, engineer, oil and gas, society, practitioner, offshore engineering, civil engineer, structural engineer |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, practitioner, communities and social development, training, design process, infrastructure and transport systems, profession |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Human Resources, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here