Ranasinghe, A (2012) Construction arbitration in Sri Lanka. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 165(2), pp. 91-94. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
In the process of dispute resolution, arbitration has been practised by commercial personnel over a long period. With the introduction of the Arbitration Act No. 11 of 1995, the process of arbitration has been refined and regularised in Sri Lanka. As the grounds for appeal in the Sri Lanka Arbitration Act are very limited, arbitration has become a popular way of resolving disputes. According to the Sri Lanka Arbitration Act, unless the parties agree otherwise, when an arbitration clause is incorporated into the contract, the jurisdiction of the court is denied. The procedure followed in Sri Lanka is a mostly ad hoc procedure. This is due to the fact that parties are reluctant to follow the institutionalised procedures as they are in some instances inconsistent with the Arbitration Act. There are three widely accepted procedures adopted in Sri Lanka and they are namely - document only, the short procedure and full procedure. The full procedure adopted in Sri Lanka is identical to the court procedure in Sri Lanka. It is important that arbitrators involved in arbitration must gain knowledge in construction law and technical knowledge in order to conduct arbitration successfully.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracts & law/disputes & arbitration |
| Index terms: | jurisdiction, arbitration, arbitrator, dispute, construction law, resolution, Sri Lanka, personnel |
| Subjects: | profession, conflict resolution, construction law, dispute resolution, management, Geography, legal systems |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Human Resources, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here