Emuze, F and Smallwood, J J (2012) Perspectives on health and safety in construction and design. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 165(1), pp. 27-34. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
Although construction contributes a disproportionate number of injuries and fatalities across geographical boundaries, developing countries such as South Africa, perform worse in this regard than developed countries. Therefore, a range of interventions through legislation and industry initiatives have been introduced in order to improve construction health and safety (H&S) in South Africa. The Construction Regulations realised client and designer responsibility for H&S, in addition to contractor responsibility. For example, clients are required to provide the principal contractor with an H&S specification, and ensure that principal contractors have made adequate allowance for H&S, while designers are required to provide the client with all the relevant information about the design, and inform the contractor of any known or anticipated dangers or hazards. Research findings indicate that the Construction Regulations are perceived to have had an impact, in particular among project managers and contractors. Construction H&S performance is influenced by the H&S specification, and anecdotal evidence suggests that the medium-to-large principal contractors and subcontractors tend to address H&S to a greater degree than small contractors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; health & safety; project management; structure & design |
| Index terms: | fatalities, project management, project manager, designer, regulation, developed country, evidence, South Africa, subcontractor, boundaries, legislation, developing country, health and safety, specification, injury, principal contractor |
| Subjects: | profession, project management theory and practice, contractual condition, health risk and incident analysis, political science, health conditions and diseases, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, legal systems, property law, development economics, Geography, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Governance, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Contract Administration, International Construction, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here