Ronny, R and Ptak, J S (2012) Localised solutions developed to suit South African challenges. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 165(1), pp. 5-11. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
Although road fatalities are an increasing challenge for developed nations in Europe and Asia, the developing nation of South Africa already experiences a disproportionate rate of vehicular and pedestrian deaths. It is estimated that South Africa's 16 000 annual road deaths cost the economy ZAR60 billion (US$7.5 billion) per year. A significant source of the country's road death toll arises from a road and transportation infrastructure developed during South Africa's political and social climate of apartheid. This resulted in a rural landscape of separation that, close to two decades later, still contains pockets of social segregation. The unique cultural and economic climate of South Africa requires infrastructure and socio-economic stimulus specifically suited for South Africa's needs. Unfortunately, job creation and sustainability measures developed overseas can prove irrelevant in an African context. In order to provide suitable solutions, The South African National Roads Agency (Sanral) created a community development implementation model establishing best-practice methodologies for South African road infrastructure projects. These best practices address root issues of poverty, education and health in line with the South African government's goals for poverty alleviation. An example of successful implementation of the Sanral model is the Blackburn Pedestrian Bridge and Walkway project in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing countries; footbridges; sustainability |
| Index terms: | developing country, community development, toll, developing nation, methodology, Asia, South Africa, agency, pedestrian, footbridge, Europe, poverty, best practice, transportation infrastructure, implementation, fatalities, infrastructure project, rural landscape |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, Geography, land management, development economics, physical geography and landforms, research methods, communities and social development, transportation engineering, business, regions and continents, health risk and incident analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology |
| Topics: | Ethics, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Procurement, International Construction, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here