Tutesigensi, A and Phung, B N (2011) Vietnamese construction workers' attitude to health and safety. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 164(1), pp. 41-47. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
The Vietnamese construction industry has a poor health and safety (H&S) record. H&S performance is influenced by, among other things, stakeholders' attitude. Construction site workers are major stakeholders in H&S. If attitude to rights and responsibilities in relation to H&S among construction workers is understood, it may be managed to improve H&S performance. Against this background, a questionnaire survey of 408 construction workers in Vietnam was undertaken to measure the workers' attitude to their rights and responsibilities and to establish the key factors that influence it. The results suggest that construction workers have, generally, a positive attitude to their rights and responsibilities. The results also suggest that there is significant association between the worker's attitude to H&S and gender, number of dependants and amount of training. Furthermore, the results suggest that there is no significant association between the worker's attitude and their age, marital status, level of education and experience. The survey leads to the conclusion that H&S performance in the Vietnamese construction industry could be improved by adopting a holistic approach to managing H&S, promoting mixed-gender work teams, and designing regular and lifelong H&S training programmes that provide for, among other things, understanding of social consequences of poor H&S performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bridges; health & safety |
| Index terms: | construction worker, construction industry, holistic approach, programme, survey, construction site, health and safety, Vietnam, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | practitioner, health safety and environment, Geography, data collection methods, business, work location, project controls, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Site Management, Time Control, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here