Mitropoulos, P and Guillama, V (2011) A framework of task demand factors for residential framing. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 164(1), pp. 19-27. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
In the USA, framing contractors consistently have the highest rate of non-fatal injuries of all speciality contractors. Residential framing contractors face additional challenges, partly due to the exception of 'residential type' activities from fall protection regulations. This study investigated residential framing accidents with a focus on the task features that affect the task difficulty of the residential framing activities and consequently the likelihood of errors and accidents. The study analysed 654 safety incidents that occurred over a period of 5 years 6 months in a large residential framing company. Accident analysis and interviews with safety and production experts identified the high-risk tasks, the errors that lead to incidents and the task elements that increase the likelihood of errors. The study identified five task factors that increase the task difficulty of residential framing activities and consequently the likelihood of accidents: (a) support conditions; (b) body posture constraints; (c) load-handling requirements; (d) tool accuracy requirements; and (e) external forces. The combination of these factors generates high task demands that can lead to errors and accidents. Reducing the task difficulty (independent of the hazards) is an important safety strategy that can reduce the likelihood of accidents while at the same time it can increase productivity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | health & safety; safety & hazards; timber |
| Index terms: | face, interview, injury, strategy, framing, accuracy, regulation, productivity |
| Subjects: | professional development, conceptual models, psychology, management, political science, health conditions and diseases, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Governance, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here