Tan, W and Dong, X (2010) Institutional innovation and financing infrastructure in Xi'an. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 163(4), pp. 143-149. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
This paper provides an account of institutional innovations in the city of Xi'an, China to access funds for infrastructure development within the constraints of central government directives. The analysis is guided by a simple framework that explains institutional changes based on the rational choice of agents. A case study is used to explore the institutional mechanisms, and these are supplemented by quantitative data. The main findings are that the Xi'an city government is less reliant on central government funds for financing infrastructure projects, thereby providing it with considerable autonomy and incentive to act by establishing a new investment vehicle, the Xi'an Infrastructure Investment Group. The bulk of funds actually came from internal sources through taxation and self-raised funds. In recent years, attempts were made to access private capital through the bond market and public-private partnerships, forcing Xi'an Infrastructure Investment Group towards greater transparency and better corporate governance. However, several issues remain, such as those pertaining to corporate governance, stop-go limits on user charges, and vulnerability of infrastructure projects to the property cycle because of its system of land assignment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | infrastructure planning; procurement; public-private partnership |
| Index terms: | partnership, transparency, institutional change, land, corporate governance, infrastructure investment, financing, taxation, property cycle, case study, infrastructure planning, China, infrastructure development, vulnerability, agent, infrastructure project |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, economic analysis, professional development, sociology, business, practitioner, partnership management, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, strategic project management, infrastructure engineering, policy economics, real estate economics, Geography |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Procurement, Business Strategy, Regulations & Compliance, Information Management, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here