Hide, G (2010) Producing a programme under the NEC form of contract. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 163(2), pp. 59-64. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
The NEC suite of contracts puts far greater contractual requirements upon the contractor to produce and manage a detailed programme than other forms of contract currently in existence within the construction industry. The contract requires this programme to be regularly updated and resubmitted for acceptance by the project manager (who acts on behalf of the employer), thus becoming the new accepted programme under the contract, superseding any previously accepted programmes. When administered properly, this should lead to both parties having a clear understanding of how the contractor plans to carry out the works in accordance with the works information and any associated liabilities in relation to the movement of the completion milestones. This paper will give an overview of the considerations required to create a programme under the NEC Engineering and Construction Contract (the most commonly used contract within the NEC suite) and offer some advice as to how section 3 (time) of the contract should be interpreted and managed efficiently to the benefit of both parties.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracts & law; project management |
| Index terms: | becoming, project manager, form of contract, construction contract, project management, construction industry, liability, movement, programme |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, project controls, industry analysis, profession, philosophical process, liability law, contract type, health behaviours and lifestyles, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Project Management, Procurement, Time Control, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here