The security consultant in the design process: A risk-led approach

Tomlinson, C and Nelson, B (2010) The security consultant in the design process: A risk-led approach. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 163(2), pp. 51-57. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

Any visitor to the Middle East will be familiar with the none-too-unattractive ad hoc security measures, usually imposed after a serious security incident; invariably these are incongruous mitigation and worryingly of doubtful efficacy. The current authors believe that in the Middle East there is a lack of knowledge of security risk management and what it offers the built environment. This is illustrated by the fact that security consultants are often appointed almost as an afterthought in many projects. Unfortunately security risk management planning and its associated design and engineering activities have never enjoyed the same obligatory status as those that surround the design of fire prevention and safety. This ignores the potential to develop a risk-led approach offering savings to clients in terms of proportionality, procurement phasing, operational efficacies and, importantly for many clients and their clients, pleasing aesthetics. This article (written by two experienced Arup security consultants) seeks to show what is on offer in the Middle East in terms of focused security risk consultancy and to champion the cause of security risk management in the region's built space.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: management; risk & probability analysis
Index terms: probability analysis, design process, Middle East, proportionality, mitigation, consultancy, savings, aesthetic, risk management, built environment, prevention
Subjects: statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, risk assessment, design methods, factor and component analysis, physical geography and landforms, financial risk, economic analysis, legal systems, organization
Topics: Risk Management, Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here