Security of payment for Hong Kong construction industry

Cheng, T; Soo, G; Kumaraswamy, M and Jin, W (2010) Security of payment for Hong Kong construction industry. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 163(1), pp. 17-28. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

In Hong Kong, getting paid is not always easy and the construction industry stands as an illustration of how much effort may be needed to achieve this and how adverse impacts can escalate from payment problems. At the moment, many jurisdictions have adopted some form of legislation or practical measures to enhance the ease and security of payment in the construction industry. Experience and insights from their operations provide guidance to Hong Kong for its way forward. By studying practices and feedback in other jurisdictions, this paper outlines and reviews the options and alternatives implemented for securing payment in the construction industry in Hong Kong. In addition, it also seeks to appraise their respective practicability for Hong Kong and highlight those areas to be considered if they are to be adopted or adapted for use in the Hong Kong construction industry. The ultimate aim is to provide an objective, balanced and reasoned overview for further study and discussion among stakeholders in the Hong Kong construction industry when moving forward. This is not intended to be an exhaustive review of all means adopted to achieve security of payment but aims to discuss those methods which are more likely to be suitable to be adopted in Hong Kong in the light of the circumstances and environment prevailing there. Furthermore, this study did not investigate the many modes of procurement that are available and which may address the concern of security of payment but focuses on the traditional form of contracts in use in Hong Kong. Public-private partnerships or private finance initiatives which would call for different discussions are not covered.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contracts and law
Index terms: form of contract, construction industry, security of payment, option, Hong Kong, partnership, private finance initiative, legislation, jurisdiction
Subjects: industry analysis, partnership management, decision analysis, Geography, warranties, legal systems, contractual arrangements
Topics: Geographical Context, Risk Management, Procurement, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here