Ansell, M; Evans, R; Holmes, M; Price, A and Pasquire, C (2009) Collaborative working in highways major maintenance projects. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 162(2), pp. 59-67. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
Over the last decade, there has been a growing emphasis on collaborations and partnering in the construction industry. This has been embraced in the UK highways maintenance sector, with partnering promoted by the client, leading to the formation of alliances and partnering frameworks. One of these is the construction management framework (CMF), the preferred method of procurement for major maintenance projects in the Highways Agency's areas 9 and 10. This paper compares two road and structure renewals schemes carried out using the CMF. The first scheme was carried out in 2004 as one of the first of its type to be undertaken by the CMF; the second was a similar project carried out in 2006. Documentation of the two projects was reviewed to identify the benefits that were gained through working in collaboration, and if there was an improvement in performance as the framework became more established. The research considered key performance indicators, including cost and time predictability measures, respect for people surveys, innovations and lessons learned discussed at the time of the projects, and instructions for changes to works information. Data collected from both schemes show improvements in measurement and culture fostered by the CMF, and the advantages of the processes used are illustrated.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | management; procurement; roads and highways |
| Index terms: | collaboration, respect for people, renewal, agency, lessons learned, documentation, survey, construction industry, key performance indicator, partnering |
| Subjects: | ethical practice, partnership management, sociology, industry analysis, renovation and retrofit, management, professional development, project delivery, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here