Fogarty, H (2009) Contractor perspective of the new Irish public works contracts. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 162(1), pp. 29-34. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
Traditionally in Ireland the forms of contract used for government-funded projects were those published by either the Institution of Engineers of Ireland or the Royal Institute of the Architects of Ireland. They were based on the Institution of Civil Engineers and Joint Contracts Tribunal standard forms with minor changes to reflect local conditions. In 2007 the Irish government introduced a suite of bespoke contract forms for both employerdesigned and contractor-designed projects. Although officially entitled 'public works contracts' they are colloquially known as the GCCC contracts after the Government Construction Contracts Committee, the body within the Irish Department of Finance responsible for drafting and introducing them. The new forms are fixed-price lump-sum contracts with considerably more construction risk transferred to contractors than under the previous forms. The forms are now mandatory for all new building and civil engineering infrastructural projects and many contractors have complained that some of the risks transferred are not only inappropriate but are incapable of assessment at tender stage. The paper sets out the history of the development of the new forms and provides an overview of the more contentious provisions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracting; contracts and law |
| Index terms: | history, public work, civil engineer, Ireland, infrastructural project, Joint Contracts Tribunal, engineer, construction contract, form of contract, architect, tender stage, drafting |
| Subjects: | infrastructure engineering, tendering, contract type, standard-form contract drafting bodies, profession, architectural and construction history, contractual arrangements, Geography, technical documentation |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Procurement, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here