Public-private delivery of urban water services in Africa

Kayaga, S (2008) Public-private delivery of urban water services in Africa. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 161(4), pp. 147-155. ISSN 17514312

Abstract

The period between 1990 and 1997 saw a record growth in the number of public-private partnerships (PPPs) for provision of water/sewerage services in developing countries. Nonetheless, PPPs have not fared well in sub-Saharan Africa, which accounted for 80% of the PPP contracts that attracted disputes or were cancelled between 1990 and 2004. Since the 1980s, management contracts between international water operators and utilities in Africa have been promoted by the World Bank and other multi-international agencies as a model that could boost management capacity in utilities of developing countries and lead to improved effectiveness and efficiency. The present study draws upon empirical data from Kampala, Uganda and uses it as a case study to show that, on the whole, these expectations were not fulfilled. It is demonstrated that the performance improvements of the National Water and Sewerage Corporation, the utility in Kampala, were not as high as expected when it was twice managed by different international operators. On the other hand, the corporation has made impressive performance improvements under the current public management model. Conclusions have been drawn from the case study on what are the drivers of performance improvement in the water utilities of developing countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contracts & law; developing countries; water supply
Index terms: Sub-Saharan Africa, water utility, water supply, developing country, agency, utilities, World Bank, dispute, partnership, Africa, case study, efficiency, Uganda, effectiveness, performance improvement
Subjects: data collection methods, dispute resolution, institutional frameworks, regions and continents, performance measurement, performance management, partnership management, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, construction type, physical geography and landforms, Geography, development economics
Topics: Legal Issues, Quality Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, International Construction, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Governance
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here