Masterson, J (2008) Employer perspective of the new Irish public works contract. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 161(3), pp. 99-105. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to set out the headline issues to be considered when preparing the new Irish public works contracts for tender. The first section provides a general introduction, which is followed by an explanation of when the new contracts should be used and a description of the different forms of the new contract that are available. The next section describes the new mindset for drafting the drawings and specification, in particular in relation to preserving the lump sum and selecting subcontractors. Risk allocation, in particular the use of the optional compensation events, is explained in the fifth section and the sixth considers the administrative requirements of the new contract that will need to be taken into account when preparing the tender. The untypical items in the schedule to the new contract that needs to be completed by the public authority are then listed and the final section contains a short conclusion. Two useful tables are also included: one sets out certain of the employer's risks in the public works contract previously used in Ireland (the IEI) and analyses whether these are included in the Government Contracts Committee for Construction (GCCC) contract, and the other sets out certain of the contractor's administrative requirements under the GCCC contract and analyses whether these are included in the IEI.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracting; contracts and law |
| Index terms: | public work, drawing, mindset, compensation, subcontractor, Ireland, risk allocation, specification, public authority, drafting |
| Subjects: | practitioner, health behaviours and lifestyles, dispute resolution, infrastructure engineering, technical documentation, financial risk, administrative law, contractual condition, Geography |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Contract Administration, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here