Guan, Z; Millard, S and Yang, Z (2008) CDIO and the Liverpool Constructionarium. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 161(2), pp. 77-83. ISSN 17514312
Abstract
The Constructionarium initiative can be classified as the implement section of the conceive, design, implement, operate (CDIO) innovative educational framework for civil engineering students. CDIO is an international learning and teaching initiative which is based on the principle of embedding active learning into engineering education at all levels. The Constructionarium provides a practical construction experience for various civil engineering structures such as a gravity concrete oil rig, a cable-stayed steel bridge, a transmission tower, a subway entrance hall and a clay core dam, all at a reduced scale. Students are required to follow the same professional and health and safety procedures that a construction contractor follows on a real construction project. A collaborating construction contractor and a design consultant offer close supervision, support and guidance for all site activities, typically covering preparation of method statements, risk assessments, construction planning, costing, setting-out, use of construction tools, and so on. The Constructionarium is a concentrated learning week for students for which there is no other equivalent replacement activity. In this paper, the Liverpool Constructionarium is presented in detail, including pre- Constructionarium preparation, learning objectives, running projects, associated problems and learning outcomes. In addition the results from pre- and post- Constructionarium questionnaires are presented to show measurement of learning outcomes from student feedback.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracting; education & training; health & safety |
| Index terms: | health and safety, construction contractor, replacement, construction project, questionnaire, active learning, engineering education, costing, construction planning, supervision, learning outcome, risk assessment, transmission tower |
| Subjects: | practitioner, materials science, professional education, financial risk, production management, health safety and environment, accounting and finance, construction planning, control systems, learning methods, data collection methods, student development, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Education, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here