An, J; Li, S and Wu, X P (2025) Multi-objective planning for time-cost trade-offs in multi-project parallel environment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(6), pp. 4051-4073. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Project managers bear the responsibility of selecting and developing resource scheduling methods that align with project requirements and organizational circumstances. This study focuses on resource-constrained project scheduling in multi-project environments. The research simplifies the problem by adopting a single-project perspective using gain coefficients. Design/methodology/approach: It employs uncertainty theory and multi-objective programming to construct a model. The optimal solution is identified using Matlab, while LINGO determines satisfactory alternatives. By combining these methods and considering actual construction project situations, a compromise solution closely approximating the optimal one is derived. Findings: The study provides fresh insights into modeling and resolving resource-constrained project scheduling issues, supported by real-world examples that effectively illustrate its practical significance. Originality/value: The research highlights three main contributions: effective resource utilization, project prioritization and conflict management, and addressing uncertainty. It offers decision support for project managers to balance resource allocation, resolve conflicts, and adapt to changing project demands.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | gain coefficient; human resource optimization; multi-objective programming models; multi-project resource-constrained project scheduling problem; time-cost trade-off; uncertainty theory |
| Index terms: | project prioritization, decision support, project scheduling, conflict management, programming, construction project, human resource, methodology, resource scheduling, project manager, resource utilization, resource allocation, time-cost trade-off, modelling |
| Subjects: | management, quantity surveying, project controls, conflict resolution, decision analysis, profession, resource management, research methods, production management, asset management, programming, operations research, analytical methods, site logistics |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Time Control, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here