Automatic lift path planning of prefabricated building components using semantic BIM, improved A* and GA

Chen, K; You, B; Zhang, Y and Chen, Z (2025) Automatic lift path planning of prefabricated building components using semantic BIM, improved A* and GA. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(6), pp. 4100-4124. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Prefabricated building has been widely applied in the construction industry all over the world, which can significantly reduce labor consumption and improve construction efficiency compared with conventional approaches. During the construction of prefabricated buildings, the overall efficiency largely depends on the lifting sequence and path of each prefabricated component. To improve the efficiency and safety of the lifting process, this study proposes a framework for automatically optimizing the lifting path of prefabricated building components using building information modeling (BIM), improved 3D-A* and a physic-informed genetic algorithm (GA). Design/methodology/approach: Firstly, the industry foundation class (IFC) schema for prefabricated buildings is established to enrich the semantic information of BIM. After extracting corresponding component attributes from BIM, the models of typical prefabricated components and their slings are simplified. Further, the slings and elements' rotations are considered to build a safety bounding box. Secondly, an efficient 3D-A* is proposed for element path planning by integrating both safety factors and variable step size. Finally, an efficient GA is designed to obtain the optimal lifting sequence that satisfies physical constraints. Findings: The proposed optimization framework is validated in a physics engine with a pilot project, which enables better understanding. The results show that the framework can intuitively and automatically generate the optimal lifting path for each type of prefabricated building component. Compared with traditional algorithms, the improved path planning algorithm significantly reduces the number of nodes computed by 91.48%, resulting in a notable decrease in search time by 75.68%. Originality/value: In this study, a prefabricated component path planning framework based on the improved A* algorithm and GA is proposed for the first time. In addition, this study proposes a safety-bounding box that considers the effects of torsion and slinging of components during lifting. The semantic information of IFC for component lifting is enriched by taking into account lifting data such as binding positions, lifting methods, lifting angles and lifting offsets.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modeling; component lifting; improved a* algorithm; prefabricated buildings
Index terms: genetic algorithm, lifting, safety factor, methodology, consumption, efficiency, building information modelling, industry foundation classes, prefabricated component, construction industry, prefabricated building
Subjects: performance management, occupational health and safety management, industry analysis, information systems, design methods, research methods, algorithms, financial risk, building construction, computational design, consumer economics
Topics: Quality Management, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here