How to reduce construction risks in rural areas: an evolutionary game analysis

Chen, W; Yang, Z; Yan, H and Zhao, Y (2025) How to reduce construction risks in rural areas: an evolutionary game analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(7), pp. 4495-4521. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The construction industry is widely recognized as one of the most hazardous sectors in the world. Despite extensive research on safety management, a critical issue remains that insufficient attention is devoted to safety practices in rural areas. Notably, accidents frequently occur during the construction of rural self-built houses (RSH) in China. Safety management tends to be overlooked due to the perceived simplicity of the construction process. Furthermore, it is essential to acknowledge that China currently lacks comprehensive laws and regulations governing safety management in RSH construction. This paper aims to analyze the behavior of key stakeholders (including households, workmen, rural village committee and the government) and propose recommendations to mitigate safety risks associated with RSH construction. Design/methodology/approach: This paper applies evolutionary game theory to analyze the symbiotic evolution among households, workmen and rural village committee, in situations with or without government participation. Additionally, numerical simulation is utilized to examine the outcomes of various strategies implemented by the government. Findings: Without government participation, households, workmen, and rural village committee tend to prioritize maximizing apparent benefits, often overlooking the potential safety risks. Numerical simulations reveal that while government involvement can guide these parties towards safer decisions, achieving the desired outcomes necessitates the adoption of reasonable and effective strategies. Thus, the government needs to offer targeted subsidies to these stakeholders. Originality/value: Considering that during the construction phase, stakeholders are the main administrators accountable for safety management. However, there exists insufficient research examining the impact of stakeholder behavior on RSH construction safety. This study aims to analyze the behavior of stakeholders about how to reduce the safety risks in building RSH. Thus, the authors intend to contribute to knowledge in this area by establishing evolutionary game model. Firstly, this study carried out a theoretical by using tripartite evolutionary game to reveal the reasons for the high safety risk during building RSH. Practically, this research points out the important role of households, workmen and rural village committee in improving safety management in rural areas. Besides, some suggestions are proposed to the government about how to reduce construction safety risks in rural areas.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: evolutionary game; government; households; rural self-built houses; rural village committee; strategy; workmen
Index terms: household, evolutionary game, construction phase, rural area, construction industry, critical issue, subsidy, numerical simulation, regulation, evolution, construction process, methodology, safety management, construction safety, China, strategy
Subjects: management, political science, environmental health, economic theory, industry analysis, occupational health and safety management, risk assessment, project delivery, modelling and simulation, Geography, research methods, building construction, demography, land use and regional development, economic analysis, environmental science
Topics: Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Urban Studies, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here