Dossick, C; Osburn, L and Neff, G (2025) Innovation through practice: The messy work of making technology useful for architecture, engineering and construction teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(7), pp. 4887-4899. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Through the study of visualizations, virtual worlds and information exchange, the purpose of this paper is to reveal the complex connections between technology and the work of design and construction. The authors apply the sociotechnical view of technology and the ramifications this view has on successful use of technology in design and construction. Design/methodology/approach: This is a discussion paper reviewing over a decade of research that connects three streams of research on architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) teams as these teams grappled with adapting work practices to new technologies and the opportunities these technologies promised. Findings: From studies of design and construction practices with building information modeling and energy modeling, the authors show that given the constructed nature of models and the loose coupling of project teams, these team organizational practices need to mirror the modeling requirements. Second, looking at distributed teams, whose interaction is mediated by technology, the authors argue that virtual world visualizations enhance discovery, while distributed AEC teams also need more traditional forms of 2D abstraction, sketching and gestures to support integrated design dialogue. Finally, in information exchange research, the authors found that models and data have their own logic and structure and, as such, require creativity and ingenuity to exchange data across systems. Taken together, these streams of research suggest that process innovation is brought about by people developing new practices. Originality/value: In this paper, the authors argue that technology alone does not change practice. People who modify practices with and through technology create process innovation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modelling; information systems; innovation; organization; technology |
| Index terms: | energy modelling, information exchange, stream, work practice, methodology, visualization, information system, virtual worlds, building information modelling, creativity, new technology, construction team, coupling, design and construction, modelling, interaction, project team |
| Subjects: | data science, project delivery, sustainability and energy, information systems, systems engineering, water management, design practice, management, innovation and technology management, contractual arrangements, analytical methods, behavioral psychology, innovation and creative processes, digital design, research methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here