Du, Q; Zhang, Y; Zeng, L; Ma, Y and Li, S (2025) Dynamic assessment of the abatement effects of the low-carbon practices in the prefabricated building supply chain. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(7), pp. 4918-4945. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Prefabricated buildings (PBs) have proven to effectively mitigate carbon emissions in the construction industry. Existing studies have analyzed the environmental performance of PBs considering the shift in construction methods, ignoring the emissions abatement effects of the low-carbon practices adopted by participants in the prefabricated building supply chain (PBSC). Thus, it is challenging to exploit the environmental advantages of PBs. To further reveal the carbon reduction potential of PBs and assist participants in making low-carbon practice strategy decisions, this paper constructs a system dynamics (SD) model to explore the performance of PBSC in low-carbon practices. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopts the SD approach to integrate the complex dynamic relationship between variables and explicitly considers the environmental and economic impacts of PBSC to explore the carbon emission reduction effects of low-carbon practices by enterprises under environmental policies from the supply chain perspective. Findings: Results show that with the advance of prefabrication level, the carbon emissions from production and transportation processes increase, and the total carbon emissions of PBSC show an upward trend. Low-carbon practices of rational transportation route planning and carbon-reduction energy investment can effectively reduce carbon emissions with negative economic impacts on transportation enterprises. The application of sustainable materials in low-carbon practices is both economically and environmentally friendly. In addition, carbon tax does not always promote the implementation of low-carbon practices, and the improvement of enterprises' environmental awareness can further strengthen the effect of low-carbon practices. Originality/value: This study dynamically assesses the carbon reduction effects of low-carbon practices in PBSC, informing the low-carbon decision-making of participants in building construction projects and guiding the government to formulate environmental policies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon reduction effect; low-carbon practices; prefabricated building supply chain; system dynamics |
| Index terms: | strategy, building construction, construction method, environmental policy, sustainable material, system dynamics, decision-making, methodology, economic impact, environmentally friendly, environmental performance, carbon emission, carbon reduction, prefabricated building, construction industry, prefabrication, implementation, environmental awareness |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, industry analysis, management, environmental behaviour, computing systems, building construction, financial analysis, research methods, sustainability assessment, sustainable design, public policy, contractual arrangements, climate science, sustainable materials |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Procurement, Risk Management, Governance, Construction Technology, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Site Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here