Construction industry changes induced by the COVID-19 pandemic

Kim, K; Tiedmann, H R and Faust, K M (2025) Construction industry changes induced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(7), pp. 4413-4438. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant societal changes and altered how much of the construction industry operates. This study investigates the impacts of pandemic-related changes, how these changes may apply to different companies, and which changes should continue post-pandemic. Design/methodology/approach: We aim to identify pandemic-driven changes that have affected the construction workplace and the advantages and challenges associated with them. We then make recommendations for what could and should endure through the pandemic and beyond, and under what circumstances. To achieve this objective, we conducted both qualitative and quantitative analyses of 40 semi-structured interviews with US-based construction professionals. Findings: Identified through these interviews were 21 pandemic-driven changes across six categories: management and planning, technology, workforce, health and safety, supply chain, and contracts. This study noted both positive and negative impacts of the changes on cost, schedule, productivity, collaboration, employee retention, flexibility, quality, and risk mitigation. Participants indicated that some changes should remain after the pandemic and others (e.g. select safety measures, schedule adjustments) should be temporary. Originality/value: By incorporating these lessons learned into recommendations, the findings of this study will help businesses identify and implement the most appropriate improvements for their organizations. The findings also provide policymakers with valuable insights on how to promote innovation in the construction industry and potentially enact more effective policies during crises to drive long-term improvements.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: change impact; construction change; covid-19; innovation; remote work
Index terms: methodology, collaboration, risk mitigation, lessons learned, quantitative analysis, health and safety, COVID-19, interview, construction professional, construction industry, retention, safety measures, pandemic, productivity
Subjects: data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, management, health risk and incident analysis, professional development, industry analysis, research methods, financial risk, health safety and environment
Topics: Human Resources, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here