Artificial intelligence-based pre-conception stage construction budget decision-making model and tool for residential buildings

Sadick, A M; Gurmu, A and Gunarathna, C (2025) Artificial intelligence-based pre-conception stage construction budget decision-making model and tool for residential buildings. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(7), pp. 4552-4580. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose: Developing a reliable cost estimate at the early stage of construction projects is challenging due to inadequate project information. Most of the information during this stage is qualitative, posing additional challenges to achieving accurate cost estimates. Additionally, there is a lack of tools that use qualitative project information and forecast the budgets required for project completion. This research, therefore, aims to develop a model for setting project budgets (excluding land) during the pre-conceptual stage of residential buildings, where project information is mainly qualitative. Design/methodology/approach: Due to the qualitative nature of project information at the pre-conception stage, a natural language processing model, DistilBERT (Distilled Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), was trained to predict the cost range of residential buildings at the pre-conception stage. The training and evaluation data included 63,899 building permit activity records (2021–2022) from the Victorian State Building Authority, Australia. The input data comprised the project description of each record, which included project location and basic material types (floor, frame, roofing, and external wall). Findings: This research designed a novel tool for predicting the project budget based on preliminary project information. The model achieved 79% accuracy in classifying residential buildings into three cost_classes ($100,000-$300,000, $300,000-$500,000, $500,000-$1,200,000) and F1-scores of 0.85, 0.73, and 0.74, respectively. Additionally, the results show that the model learnt the contextual relationship between qualitative data like project location and cost. Research limitations/implications: The current model was developed using data from Victoria state in Australia; hence, it would not return relevant outcomes for other contexts. However, future studies can adopt the methods to develop similar models for their context. Originality/value: This research is the first to leverage a deep learning model, DistilBERT, for cost estimation at the pre-conception stage using basic project information like location and material types. Therefore, the model would contribute to overcoming data limitations for cost estimation at the pre-conception stage. Residential building stakeholders, like clients, designers, and estimators, can use the model to forecast the project budget at the pre-conception stage to facilitate decision-making.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial intelligence; buildings; construction cost; early-design stage; natural language processing; project budget
Index terms: methodology, decision-making, construction project, roofing, design stage, estimator, accuracy, cost estimating, cost estimate, land, artificial intelligence, future study, Victoria, construction cost, deep learning, construction budget, designer, Australia, residential building
Subjects: decision analysis, professional development, design practice, financial and cost management, regions and continents, artificial intelligence, real estate economics, research design and methodology, profession, production management, Geography, research methods, professional practice, construction type
Topics: Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Risk Management, Project Management, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here