Wijewickrama, M K C S; Chileshe, N; Rameezdeen, R and Ochoa, J J (2025) Information processing model for quality assurance in reverse logistics supply chains of demolition waste. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(13), pp. 193-212. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: Quality assurance (QA) plays an important role in the reverse logistics supply chains (RLSCs) of demolition waste (DW); however, it is adversely impacted by information deficiencies, which create epistemic uncertainties that are not isolated but integrated. No previous study has modelled the effect of interrelated epistemic uncertainties on an operational performance criterion, such as QA. This study aimed to develop and empirically validate an information processing model for QA in RLSCs of DW. Design/methodology/approach: An explanatory sequential mixed-method research approach was followed. First, 20 structured interviews were conducted with experts in the DW management sector. Then, the Bayesian belief network (BBN) modelling approach was used to develop the conceptual information processing for QA. Finally, a focus group discussion was conducted to validate the developed model empirically. Findings: The study developed a conceptual information processing model, where the impact on QA was reflected through the combined effect of macro-, meso- and micro-level uncertainties in the RLSCs. The demolisher's epistemic uncertainties are propagated through macro-level uncertainties to meso- and micro-level uncertainties and then connect with the waste processor's uncertainties through "mixed waste received from demolishers". Originality/value: The model can be used to enhance the practitioners' understanding of the impact of epistemic uncertainties on QA within the supply chain. This study also contributes to the knowledge by identifying cause-and-effect relationships between epistemic uncertainties for QA, which is an overlooked area in the discipline.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | demolition waste; epistemic uncertainties; quality assurance; reverse logistics supply chains |
| Index terms: | reverse logistics, information processing, modelling, bayesian belief network, quality assurance, interview, focus group, demolition waste, methodology, practitioner |
| Subjects: | data science, data collection methods, probabilistic model, analytical methods, practitioner, waste management, quality assurance, supply chain operations, research methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here