Xiang, P; Yang, S; Yuan, Y and Li, R (2025) Integrated measurement of public safety risks in international construction projects in the belt and road initiative. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(7), pp. 4673-4699. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the public safety risks of international construction projects (ICPs) from the perspective of threat and vulnerability. A novel and comprehensive risk assessment approach is developed from a systemic perspective and applied to the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to improve the public safety risk management strategy for ICPs in BRI. Design/methodology/approach: First, a public safety risk indicator system was constructed from the two dimensions, namely threat and vulnerability. Next, an integrated measurement model was constructed by combining the Genetic Algorithm-Backpropagation (GA-BP) neural network, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and matter-element extension (MME) method. Data from 49 countries involved in the BRI, as well as five typical projects, were used to validate the model. Finally, targeted risk prevention measures were identified for use at the national, enterprise and project levels. Findings: The findings indicate that while the vulnerability risks of typical projects in each region of the BRI were generally low, threat risks were high in West Asia and North Africa, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries and South Asia. Originality/value: First, the structure of the public safety risk system of ICPs was analyzed using vulnerability and system theories. The connotation of public safety risk was defined based on two dimensions, namely threat and vulnerability. The idea of measuring threat risk with public data and measuring vulnerability risk with project data was clarified, and the risk measurement was integrated into the measurement results to help researchers and managers understand and systematically consider the public safety risks of ICPs. Second, a public safety risk indicator system was constructed, including 18 threat risk indicators and 14 vulnerability risk indicators to address the gaps in the existing research. The MEE model was employed to overcome the problem of incompatible indicator systems and provide stable and credible integrated measurement results. Finally, the whole-process public safety risk management scheme designed in this study can help to both provide a reference point for the Chinese enterprises and oversea contractors in market selection as well as improve ICP public safety risk management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | integrated measurement; international construction projects; public safety risk; the belt and road initiative; vulnerability |
| Index terms: | manager, genetic algorithm, public safety, neural network, project data, strategy, methodology, Asia, vulnerability, international construction project, North Africa, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, risk assessment, risk management, dimension, prevention |
| Subjects: | management, emergency and crisis management, data collection methods, risk assessment, artificial intelligence, health monitoring assessment and metrics, regions and continents, physical geography and landforms, algorithms, research methods, financial risk, decision-making and optimization, environmental hazards, strategic management, practitioner |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Digital Applications, International Construction, Risk Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here