Chen, B and Jia, Z (2025) Stress and deformation characteristics of 'dual-purpose diaphragm wall' in metro stations. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 21(3), pp. 571-587. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Under the condition of a 'dual-purpose diaphragm wall', the stress states and deformation laws are quite different from theoretical calculation results, the transfer and distribution law of the earth pressure between the sidewall of the station structure and diaphragm wall and the internal force of the station structure are uncertain. Due to the complex interaction between the exterior wall of the station and the diaphragm wall of the retaining structure, model tests and numerical simulations were used to research the stress and deformation characteristics of the compound wall system and composite wall system. The research results show that the compound wall system has a great load reduction effect and can effectively improve the stress state of the station structure. However, the internal force of the embedded segment of diaphragm walls was surprisingly increased. The earth pressure distribution rate (K) of the composite wall system and compound wall system increases nonlinearly along the direction of the foundation pit depth, while the distribution rates of the earth pressure in both systems are between 0.302∼0.557 and 0.239∼0.455. Compared with the composite wall, the reduction of the earth pressure in the compound wall system can be divided into three parts: the released part, the transferred part and the converted part accounting for 57%, 23% and 20% of the reduction of the earth pressure, respectively. It is recommended to give priority to the use of the compound wall system in the practice.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | composite wall; compound wall; deformation; earth pressure; load reduction; stress transfer |
| Index terms: | deformation, accounting, diaphragm wall, interaction, composite, numerical simulation |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, behavioral psychology, materials science, economic analysis, material properties and characteristics, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here