King, T H and Jemtrud, M (2025) A strategic niche management framework to scale deep energy retrofits. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 310-326. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Mass deployment of deep energy retrofits (DERs) is essential to drive the building stock transition to net zero. However, the rate of DER adoption remains extremely low, as existing financial, technical, regulatory and social systems favour piecemeal retrofit approaches. To address this issue, this paper applies strategic niche management (SNM)—a core theory in transition studies that focuses on creating ‘niches’ to help novel technologies gain momentum—to understand the role ‘transition intermediaries’ play in scaling DER. Specifically, three mass DER initiatives are explored that use an industrialised overcladding approach: Energiesprong in the Netherlands; RetrofitNY in New York, US; and REALIZE-MA, in Massachusetts, US. The study examines how each intermediary has addressed regionally specific barriers and opportunities to industrialised DERs through a systematic, iterative SNM framework of niche formation processes. These include choice of technology, selection, design and scaling up of the experiments, and the breakdown of protection mechanisms. SNM could be used as a practical tool to analyse and inform interventions to accelerate DER adoption in diverse jurisdictions. Furthermore, the importance of intermediaries is vital for catalysing transformations to secure a healthy, resilient, high-performing and environmentally responsible building stock.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building energy; building stock; net zero; retrofit; retrofit strategy; stakeholder management; systems thinking |
| Index terms: | experiment, jurisdiction, retrofit strategy, systems thinking, stakeholder management, social system, New York, intermediary, net zero, transformation, scaling, Netherlands, building stock |
| Subjects: | organization, data collection methods, participation process, social theory, asset management, business, legal systems, Geography, energy systems, renovation and retrofit, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here