Miles-Shenton, D; Parker, J; Glew, D and Thomas, F (2025) Quantifying inter-dwelling air exchanges during fan pressurisation tests. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 239-254. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Fan pressurisation tests (FPTs) are commonly used to measure air leakage in homes, to provide evidence for compliance with energy and ventilation standards in building regulations and inform energy models. The results are presented of 37 pressurisation and co-pressurisation tests on attached homes in the UK which measured inter-dwelling air exchanges during the FPTs. On average, 21% of the air leakage measured by the FPTs was found to be inter-dwelling rather than inside-to-outside air exchange, i.e. homes are more airtight than FPTs indicate, which is important when assessing energy efficiency and ventilation performance thresholds. Not accounting for inter-dwelling air exchanges poses a risk of under-ventilation and misclassification of homes deemed suitable for natural ventilation. Using the FPT result to replace default values for airtightness in energy models used to create Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) for 11 of the case study homes improved their energy efficiency rating (EER), indicating default airtightness values used in EPCs used were overestimating the air leakage. Using the co-pressurisation value resulted in an additional EER point. These modest improvements represented a 5%, 8% and 3% reduction in predicted annual carbon emission, space heating demand and fuel bills, respectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | airtightness; building regulations; energy models; fan pressurisation test; inter-dwelling air exchange; ventilation |
| Index terms: | compliance, default, ventilation, natural ventilation, space heating, evidence, accounting, building regulation, energy efficiency, case study, carbon emission, energy model, energy performance certificate |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, data collection methods, air quality, mechanical systems, energy systems, sustainability and energy, regulatory law, environmental engineering, climate science, evaluation and assessment methods, economic analysis, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here