Terblanche, R; May, C and Steward, J (2025) Implementing and operating net zero buildings in South Africa. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 255-271. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
A total of 34 buildings in South Africa (ZA) have received a net zero certification between 2017 and 2023. These buildings are becoming more crucial to combatting climate change due to the reduced carbon emissions and resource efficiencies in net zero buildings (NZBs). However, in ZA, the uptake is low and slow. This study investigates the motivators and challenges of implementing and operating NZBs in ZA. Although the literature provides an insight into the motivators and challenges on a macro-scale in developed countries, these studies overlook the unique drivers and barriers faced in a micro-scale and developing countries. Semi-structured interviews with five built-environment specialists were conducted. The motivators to implement NZBs include environmental sustainability, energy-efficient systems, a reduction in the carbon footprint, viability due to long-term savings, limited natural resources, regulations, demand, global awareness and technological advancements. The motivators to operate NZBs include tenant demand and reduction in operating costs. Challenges to implement NZBs include high interest rates, a lack of awareness and education among stakeholders, a carbon-intensive energy grid, lack of tenant engagement and the grid’s inability to support privately generated electricity to be distributed to other consumers. The challenges to operate NZBs include high operating costs, complex operating manuals and a lengthy payback period.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; Global South; net zero buildings; net zero carbon; real estate; South Africa; transition |
| Index terms: | natural resource, savings, carbon emission, becoming, carbon footprint, construction industry, motivator, operating cost, real estate, resource efficiency, net zero, net zero certification, tenant, developing country, interview, climate change, environmental sustainability, South Africa, developed country, regulation, payback, interest rate |
| Subjects: | climate science, practitioner, environmental impact, environmental resource management, psychology, economic analysis, sustainability assessment, development economics, Geography, health safety and environment, philosophical process, data collection methods, real estate economics, energy systems, management, political science, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Governance, Urban Studies, Human Resources, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here