Exploring interactions between shading and view using visual difference prediction

Wasilewski, S and Andersen, M (2025) Exploring interactions between shading and view using visual difference prediction. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 281-293. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

For a given view content, how well a view can be seen through different facade layers, or ‘view visibility’, depends on both the properties of the facade and the incident lighting. This dependency makes view visibility challenging to measure and quantify, which makes it difficult to understand how the benefits of a view through a window may be preserved by partially occluding facade layers. With the objective of relating the optical properties of different dynamic shading systems to what will be visible through these systems, this paper leverages existing vision models to synthetically analyse a range of facade and view scenarios. The primary outcome is that one such model, the HDR-VDP-3, usefully responds to the scenarios tested. The response is as expected for parameters with known impacts on visibility, such as direct and diffuse transmission, and free viewing area. It is also sensitive to view features such as high-contrast edges, low-contrast details and composition. Moving forward, these findings should be used to confirm the fundamental attributes of human visual perception across shading systems and, relying on human subjects, calibrate them to models’ responses. This can help guide future research into preserving the ‘key’ qualities of a view.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building simulation; daylight; dynamic facades; prediction model; shading; view clarity; views
Index terms: prediction model, window, human subject, shading, visual perception, interaction, building simulation
Subjects: modelling and simulation, prediction and forecasting, building design, architectural elements, cognitive psychology, research management, behavioral psychology
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here