Detecting skewed pricing in tenders for public-sector projects

Hyari, K H and Thneibat, M (2025) Detecting skewed pricing in tenders for public-sector projects. Construction Innovation, 25(4), pp. 1153-1170. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose: Skewed pricing is a typical tactic used by tenderers in unit price projects to gain additional advantages at the expense of the owner or other competing tenderers. This paper aims to describe the development of a model for detecting skewed pricing in competitive tendering for unit price contracts. Design/methodology/approach: The model evaluates how much the offered unit rates for work items deviate from the reasonable rate identified from the item’s submitted unit rates. Item rate deviations are integrated into a total deviation score for each submitted tender based on the relative weight of the work item to the total project amount. The model allows for assigning higher weights to work items that are more prone to skewed pricing, such as those that are performed early and those that are expected to experience quantity fluctuations. Findings: The paper presents a detection model that uses only the submitted prices of the competing tenderers to perform the needed calculations, which reduces subjectivity in identifying skewed tenders. Two examples are given to demonstrate how the model may be used to detect skewed tenders. Originality/value: The model supports tendering officials in the challenging task of identifying skewed tenders, which is required by rules and regulations governing public procurement. The model’s ease of use is expected to make it more widely used as a decision-support tool during the tender evaluation stage of real-world projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bid price; competitive tendering; detection; skewed tender; tender evaluation; unbalanced bidding; unbalanced pricing; unit price
Index terms: pricing, owner, deviation, competitive tendering, subjectivity, unit rate, methodology, regulation, tender evaluation, unbalanced bidding
Subjects: financial and cost management, sociology, political science, human factors and perception, economic analysis, bidding, tendering, research methods
Topics: Procurement, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here