Jain, K and Devkar, G (2025) Development and testing of lean simulation game on set-based design. Construction Innovation, 25(4), pp. 1035-1057. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: Set-based design (SBD) is a lean tool widely adopted for improving design processes and providing value maximization to clients. The purpose of this paper is to present the development and testing of a lean simulation game that incorporated point-based and SBD principles. The objective of the game was to enhance learning of lean design management among construction students. Design/methodology/approach: After a thorough and comprehensive literature review consisting of secondary data in journal papers, books, thesis references and primary data in the form of interviews with lean practitioners, the simulation game prototype was developed. The testing of the game was carried out with a study group. Data were collected during the gameplay with the help of a questionnaire survey on a confidence scale and Likert scale and assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, histogram, one-sample t-test and false discovery rate (Benjamini–Hochberg) correction method. Findings: The data collected both pre- and post-simulation showed an increase in average confidence in understanding from 3.33 to 3.89, a 16.7% rise. The data was further interpreted by using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, indicating that the post-simulation learning experience was significantly better than the pre-simulation one. Promising positive results were obtained for the questions on game design, engagement and understanding of point-based design and SBD concepts. Originality/value: The simulation game helps bridge the gap between knowledge building and real-life by effectively imitating the process. The game facilitates a dynamic and critical approach toward developing new educational simulation games and their successful incorporation in propagating lean principles in the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; design; lean; management; point-based; set-based; simulation; value |
| Index terms: | design process, interview, survey, maximization, journal, prototype, literature review, practitioner, Likert scale, questionnaire, methodology, design management, secondary data, testing, construction industry, learning experience |
| Subjects: | design process, research methods, algorithms, professional practice, practitioner, research dissemination and communication, industry analysis, data analysis and analytics, modelling and simulation, learning methods, design methods, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Education, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here