Awareness, usage and benefits of building information modelling (BIM) adoption-the case of South Australian construction organizations

Newton, K L and Chileshe, N (2012) Awareness, usage and benefits of building information modelling (BIM) adoption-the case of South Australian construction organizations. In: Smith, S D (ed.) Proceedings of 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK.

Abstract

Research has shown that while Building information modelling (BIM) is not a new concept, and that its uptake is becoming an increasingly important factor in the efficiency and international competitiveness of the Australian construction industry (ACI), when compared with other industries, the ACI is often regarded as being slow to implement new ideas and technologies. Furthermore, they are limited studies conducted which seek to assess the current levels of awareness, usage and advocated benefits of BIM among construction organizations, within the context of South Australia. The study is aimed at filling that knowledge gap. The objectives of this study were to: (1) ascertain the current awareness and determine usage rates of BIM adoption; and (2) establish the advocated benefits relating to the adoption of BIM relative to its impact on project outcomes among the stakeholders of the South Australian construction industry. A field study was conducted with a randomly selected sample of twenty-nine construction organizations. Ten BIM benefits were used, and survey response data were collected using structured questionnaires and analysed using mean and ranking analysis. Relative to the awareness and usage, the findings indicates that a significant proportion of respondents have little or no understanding on the concept of BIM and the usage was found to be very low. The results indicated that 'improved constructability', 'improved visualization', 'improved productivity', and 'reduced clashes' as the highly ranked benefits associated with BIM adoption. The highly ranked major issues surrounding the adopting or use of BIM were 'lack of understanding about BIM', 'education and training costs' 'start-up costs' and 'changing the way firms do business'. The practical implication for Senior Managers within the construction organizations are that; awareness of BIM processes through education and training; both formal and informal process including more information, and provision of expertise within BIM could enhance the levels of adoption.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: modelling; awareness; construction industry; South Australia
Index terms: productivity, project outcome, survey, construction organization, manager, efficiency, field study, building information modelling, becoming, construction industry, modelling, visualization, constructability, education and training, South Australia, competitiveness, questionnaire
Subjects: construction integration, research methods, performance management, management, physical geography and landforms, design practice, professional education, market analysis, information systems, philosophical process, industry analysis, organization, project completion, data collection methods, practitioner, analytical methods
Topics: Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Education
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here