Bromilow, F J and Tucker, S N (1983) Terotechnological optimality in construction. Construction Papers, 2(1), pp. 41-50. ISSN 0144-8587
Abstract
Conditions for optimum utilisation as measured by minimum total life cycle cost of initial capital, maintenance, energy and other recurrent costs for a given level of building service have been studied theoretically. Evaluation of these conditions suggests that, for Australian conditions, society is paying a surcharge above the minimum cost for its buildings over their whole life cycles. This surcharge provides a measure of the trade-off between price and convenience for a given level of utility to building owners. Action to reduce it to anywhere near the theoretical limit would revolutionise building design, practises, standards and regulations. Although technological constraints probably prevent the theoretical optimum from being attainable, savings of 10% in capital costs with corresponding savings of 7% in discounted total life costs for commercial buildings appear to be practically achievable. The economic, technical and social significance of these tentative conclusions suggest the need for more detailed research, the direction of which is outlined.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | savings, owner, whole life cycle, building design, building service, regulation, commercial building, life cycle cost, capital cost, society |
| Subjects: | construction type, architectural design, economic analysis, sustainability assessment, accounting and finance, research methods, communities and social development, engineering systems, sociology, political science |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here