Architects' perceptions of LEED indoor environmental quality checklist items on employee productivity

Hepner, C M and Boser, R A (2006) Architects' perceptions of LEED indoor environmental quality checklist items on employee productivity. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 2(3), pp. 193-208. ISSN 1557-8771

Abstract

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification and the application of associated design checklists are becoming increasingly common in contemporary building design and construction. At the time of the study, the United States Green Building Council's (USGBC) website stated that, from 2001 to 2003, there was a 467% increase in USGBC membership, a 162% increase in certification, and a 77% increase in registered projects. The website also noted that approximately 12% of new commercial spaces were LEED certified (USGBC, 2002). Research literature reports that most employees spend 80% of their day indoors and that the indoor environment may be up to 10 times more polluted than outdoor air. Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ), therefore, may directly affect a person's health and productivity. Despite the potential impact of poor IEQ on employees, few studies have been able to make a direct association between specific IEQ items and their impact on productivity. This study reviews of each of the 17 components that comprise the LEED IEQ checklist and investigates architects' perceptions of checklist components on employee productivity. Although this study was based on the LEED Version 2.1, the components of the current New Construction Version 2.2 (2005) are essentially the same.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: indoor air quality; indoor environmental quality; LEED; productivity; usgbc
Index terms: certification, United States, green building, indoor air quality, becoming, building design, indoor environment, productivity, environmental design, architect, indoor environmental quality
Subjects: environmental science, architectural design, philosophical process, Geography, sustainability and energy, profession, administrative processes, environmental health, design practice, management
Topics: Design Practice, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here