Clapp, D; Shuler, S; Nobe, M D; Demiranda, M and Nobe, M E C (2007) Capital equipment acquisition in heavy construction. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 3(3), pp. 159-178. ISSN 1557-8771
Abstract
Capital equipment acquisition is an important process in the heavy construction industry. Equipment is often one of the largest investments for a company and has a significant effect on cash flow and profit potential. The purpose of this article is to investigate capital equipment acquisition processes of heavy construction companies. The equipment acquisition process was analyzed by evaluating equipment replacement policies, the position of the individual making equipment purchasing decisions, and the effect of company size on equipment replacement policy. A questionnaire was used to survey members of the Associated General Contractors of America and various asphalt and concrete pavement trade associations in the United States. Results suggest there is a direct correlation between the size of the company and the use of capital budgets and equipment policies as decision-making tools. Results further indicate that the chief executive officer is often the decision maker when it comes to equipment acquisition, regardless of company size. Equipment replacement is based on repair cost and equipment efficiency. An average of 75% of equipment is owned and is paid for in cash or through lease-buy options.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | acquisition; decision analysis; heavy equipment |
| Index terms: | United States, cash flow, general contractor, survey, profit, decision-making, questionnaire, chief executive officer, repair, replacement, efficiency, lease, purchasing, decision analysis, acquisition, heavy construction, option |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, business, financial management, performance management, procurement strategy, infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, materials science, practitioner, economic analysis, Geography, land economics, maintenance engineering |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Risk Management, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here